Kisah Jerih Kehidupan dari Korea

Dengarkan cerita anak ini...dibuang ketika tiga tahun dan membesar berseorangan, namun beliau lalui kehidupannya dengan tabah. 10 tahun tidur ditangga atau di tandas awam (maknanya tandas awam di Korea sangat bersih). Kalau tidur ditandas awam Malaysia boleh mati doh.Beliau mempunyai suara yang hebat.

Dengarkan ..

War In Libya- Gaddafi Getting Stronger

<span style="font-weight:bold;">Gaddafi Is Stronger Than Ever In Libya - The Fact Gaddafi Has Survived The Rebellions And Nato Bombing Undermines The Simplistic View Of A Hated Tyrant Clinging On - By Richard Seymour (1/8/11)
Richard Seymour
Sunday, 31 July 2011 22:04


The Guardian, UK

The war on Libya has not gone well. Kim Sengupta's report on Wednesday detailed this starkly:

"Fresh diplomatic efforts are under way to try to end Libya's bloody civil war, with the UN special envoy flying to Tripoli to hold talks after Britain followed France in accepting that Muammar Gaddafi cannot be bombed into exile.

The change of stance by the two most active countries in the international coalition is an acceptance of realities on the ground. Despite more than four months of sustained air strikes by Nato, the rebels have failed to secure any military advantage. Colonel Gaddafi has survived what observers perceive as attempts to eliminate him and, despite the defection of a number of senior commanders, there is no sign that he will be dethroned in a palace coup.

The regime controls around 20% more territory than it did in the immediate aftermath of the uprising on 17 February."

If the Gaddafi regime is now more in control of Libya than before, then this completely undermines the simplistic view put about by the supporters of war – and unfortunately by some elements of the resistance – that the situation was simply one of a hated tyrant hanging on through mercenary violence. Of course, he uses whatever resources he has at his disposal, but a) it would seem that the involvement of imperialism has driven some Libyans back into the Gaddafi camp, as it's unlikely he would maintain control without some degree of support, and b) we know that rebellious sectors started to go back to Gaddafi within mere weeks of the revolt taking off, meaning in part that his resources of legitimising his regime were not exhausted even before the US-led intervention. Despite the defections, he has consolidated his regime in a way that would have seemed improbable in the early weeks of revolt.

It's important to bear in mind what this means. Both Ben Ali and Mubarak had the support of the US and its major allies – especially Mubarak. They had considerable resources for repression, and there was financial aid being channelled to them, talks aimed at offering reforms to the opposition … and in the end they proved too brittle, too narrowly based, to stay in power.

The state apparatus began to fragment and decompose. The protests kept spreading, and withstood the bloodshed. Nothing they could offer or threaten was sufficient. Gaddafi, on the other hand, has hung on in the face of not only a lack of support from his former imperialist allies, but active political, diplomatic and military opposition. That he did so to a considerable extent through sheer military superiority doesn't mean that the regime hasn't a real social basis.

Perhaps as important has been the weaknesses of the rebellion. I argued that the chief problem facing the revolt was that it had taken off before any civil society infrastructure had been built up to sustain the opposition. This meant that unrepresentative former regime elements were well placed to step into the fray and take effective control. As a result of the defeats they faced, those arguing for an alliance with Nato grew stronger and gained more control. There's no question that if Nato really wanted to, they could defeat Gaddafi. It would, however, require a level of commitment (serious ground forces) that they aren't ready to use. I think this is because, far from this being a pre-planned wave of expansionism by the US, the decision to launch an aerial assault constituted a desperate act of crisis management, which the "realists" in the administration were never particularly happy with. Only the zealots of "humanitarian intervention" could seriously have contemplated the kind of protracted, bloody land war in Libya that would have been necessary to win. So, the bet on an alliance with Nato now appears to have been doomed from the start, even on its own terms – even if the best outcome sought was nothing more than a slightly more liberal regime incorporated into the imperialist camp.

Now, what can Libya expect? The leading war powers are once more bruiting negotiations, but to what end? Gaddafi may be persuaded to abandon direct control, in which case the result will most likely be a moderately reformed continuity regime, with ties to European and US capital fully restored.

There appears to be little prospect of his going into exile. But that's not all. The Transitional Council led by former regime elements continues to state that it is the only legitimate authority in Libya. It has been internationally recognised as such by a number of crucial powers. But this is pure cynicism. The imperialist powers know that the Transitional Council can't control all of Libya. They're certainly not taking any steps now to give them the military means to do so. So this means that the tendencies toward partition are sharpened.

There are signs of such a resolution being offered as a "temporary" measure to secure the peace and allow some process of national reconciliation to take place (note that this conflict has increasingly been described as a civil war). This would be economically disabling for all of Libya, including those territories controlled by the rebels. It would also be dangerous in ways that I hope I don't need to spell out.

The final justification for this debacle will be that speedy intervention, however half-hearted, prevented a massacre. Now, there may once have been reason to believe this. But there no longer is.

Gaddafi has enough blood on his hands, and deserved to fall to the insurgents, but there's no reason to submit to war propaganda. In reality, as Amnesty put it, "there is no proof of mass killing of civilians on the scale of Syria or Yemen". Which is an interesting way of putting it. It's no secret that the coalition that was supposedly preventing a genocidal bloodbath in Libya was actually behind much of the bloodshed in Yemen. This completely demolishes the last leg of the moral case for war. The "humanitarian interventions" of the 1990s left the US in a stronger position, both geopolitically and ideologically. I'm not convinced that this will be the result of the bombing of Libya. In fact, if there was any idea that the US could offer an alternative model of development for the populations of the Middle East, it now lies in ruins. It is more than unfortunate that Libya had to be reduced to ruins for this to become apparent.

Hilang akal terkena asap???...kah kah kah

ada seorang pelakon hebat yang mati dua kali dan diisythiharkan syahid, kini mendakwa telah hilang akal akibat terkena asap.

Asap yang memedihkan mata ni rupanya boleh membuat manusia hilang akal...atau manusia yang mendakwa hilang akal ni memang tak berakal jadi tak ada apa yang hilang...

Kalau hendak memperjuangkan kebenaran, jangan berbohong. kalau kita berbohong tarafnya sama dengan manusia manusia yang hendak kita tentang. Hakikatnya kebenaran memang susah hendak diperjuangkan, memang meletihkan untuk ditegakkan. kebenaran yang ditegakkan dengan pembohongan tidak akan tahan lama kerana ia akhirnya akan dicemari oleh pembohongan kita.

PERSATUAN USAHAWAN, KONSULTAN DAN PENGARAH ISLAM? hahaha mungkin satu lagi NGO badut seperti PERKASA....buanglah perkataan ISLAM kat hujung tu,memalukan...Kalau macam ni mentaliti usahawan, pengarah dan konsultan Islam habislah...akhirnya orang-orang Islam jadi hamba Cina sajalah

Siakap senohong Gelama Ikan Duri...

Salam Ramadhan Al Mubarak

Kepada semua warga alam maya

LEGASI PROTON - DAH 20 TAHUN TAK RETI BUAT KERETA

Mungkin nasib aku kurang baik, mungkin ada tulah atau sial yang menimpa aku tak tahu. Ketika hati tengah marah ni macam-macam lah sumpah seranah yang keluar.

Nasib aku malang kerana membuat keputusan membeli Proton Saga kerana sejak mula membelinya, sudah lah ditipu oleh jurujual yang tidak mahu bersusah payah mendapatkan no tender dengan menipu aku dengan mengatakan no yang aku minta belum sampai turn ( tetapi bila kereta aku sampai no pendaftarannya hanya berbeza 110! aku minta no 28xx kereta aku sekrg bernombor 29xx dan kemudian khidmat lepas jualan yang sangat teruk.

Masalah kereta aku adalah kuncinya disekalikan dengan immbolizer (dalam kunci ada transponder). Dan kini atas apa masalah yang aku tak paham, kereta aku tak boleh dihidupkan. Ke dua dua kunci yang dibekalkan tidak berfungi.

Alasan yang diberikan adalah kunci ini tak boleh terjatuh! aku nak tanya proton kunci kereta mana yang tak pernah terjatuh? kunci toyota isteriku sebelum ni pun berpuluh kali terhatuh tak ada masalah langsung. Takkan kunci proton jatuh sekali dah jam? Bagaimana dengan kunci spare?

To make matters worse, I Care is really I Dont Care service, cakap banyak tapi kalau setakat ada 2-3 towing lorry don't call your self customer oriented la bro. Malu. I have been waiting for four hours to get them to tow my 3 week old car to service centre masih tak nampak batang hidung.

Aku rasa CEO proton ni tak malu kot tengok kereta proton baru usia 3 minggu tersadai kat tepi jalan. Proton crap (click here)

Kalau dahulu Proton terkenal dengan power window yang tak power kini Proton akan di kenal dengan ' immobliser that really imm0bilised you'. Kalau kunci pun tak reti nak buat, berhentilah buat kereta...

Akhirnya...

Akhirnya kuasa undi lebih besar nilai maknanya.

Mungkin aku perlu tanya Bob Lokman kembali

Anak-anak dia jadi macam yang dia kata tu sebab BN sahaja ke?

atau sebab umat Islam dah tak ade telur nak tegak agama sendiri

aku bukan cakap pasal telur UMNO sahaja aku tanya juga telur PAS mana?

Takkan sepanjang hayat nak salahkan UMNO?

Dah TUHAN bagi kuasa simpan dalam seluar dalam.

Cakap berdegar-degar

Ekor bergelumang tahi

Kalau UMNO kau sebat semacam sebab tak berani tegak Islam

Haa..dah TUHAN bagi kau kuasa pa hal pulak kau takut?

Kalau alasan kerana ia hanya untuk bukan Islam...

UMNO bagi alasan yang sama,

1. Kedai-kedai arak semua untuk bukan Islam

2. Magnum dan 4 ekor semua untuk bukan islam

3. Judi di Genting semua untuk bukan Islam

4.Judi Bola semua untuk bukan Islam

5. Lesen-lesen yang UMNO lulus semua untuk bukan Islam

Kau melalak pulak kata ambil Islam separuh separuh

Kuasa bukan DAP bagi, Kuasa adalah anugerah TUHAN! yang kau bangang tu kenapa?

Kenapa masih menoleh pada UMNO menyalahkan UMNO tak nasihat MCA?

UMNO memang dah hanyut bang aji oi

Kau kena herdik dengan Kit Siang dah ketaq kepala lutut

Kalau UMNO kau pertikai sama ada dijalan yang benar atau tidak

Maknanya Kau berada dijalan yang benar

Nah sekarang tunjukkan jalan kebenaran sepatutnya..

Tetiba pandai pulak..kau kata nak tegak Islam kena ambil masa

tapi pada masa yang sama kau mencaci UMNO kerana ambil masa 50 tahun

tak tegak Islam

Takkan kau nak ambil masa 50 tahun lagi baru nak tegak Islam

Begitulah manusia penjual-penjual agama

Selepas ini tolong jangan umpat UMNO kalau diri sendiri bergelumang

dengan segala macam ketakutan dan kecintaan pada dunia

PAS Di TIDAK CERDIKKAN OLEH DAP

Perkataan TIDAK CERDIK adalah bahasa lembut kepada perkataan BODOH. Perkataan TIDAK cerdik ini digemari oleh orang-orang pantai timur. Dato' Nik Aziz sangat gemar menggunakan perkataan ini terutama dalam membicarakan tentang UMNO.

Namun begitu dalam Sinar Harian hari ini, DAP menggambarkan bahawa Kerajaan PAS , TIDAK CERDIK dalam hal tindakannya mengarahkan semua pusat-pusat hiburan dikedah ditutup dalam bulan Ramadhan. (KLIK SINI). Dalam bahasa yang lebih telus DAP menggambarkan sebagai BODOH!. Aku ingin melihat reaksi pemimpin PAS terhadap kenyataan kurang ajar DAP kepada PAS ini.

Aku ingin melihat reaksi Ustaz Nasrudeen Hassan At Tantawi terhadap kenyataan yang mencabar maruah ini. Menegakkan prinsip PAS bukan perkara bodoh bagi PAS, tetapi ini tidak difahami oleh puak-puak cauvinis ini. Mereka cukup takut kehilangan undi Cina berbanding PAS kehilangan undi Melayu.

Selamat datang kelam realiti kepad PAS, jika PAS membatalkan maka PAS pun tidak berbeza seperti UMNO. maka PAS bolehlah menukar nama kepada Parti Negara Berkebajikan untuk mengelakkan DAP hilang undi Cina.

Sebenarnya pada aku tindakan mengarahkan penutupan pusat hiburan ini tidak menjamin Umat Islam tidak akan melakukan maksiat jika tidak disertai dengan program-program dakwah yang berkesan. Namum ia akan menampakkan profil Islam PAS yang lebih baik dari UMNO.

Lebih baik PAS menempatkan ahli-ahlinya ke tempat-tempat yang diketahui dikunjungi oleh umat Islam dan memberi tazkirah dan nasihat-nasihat ala jemaah tabligh atau spt yang pernah dilakukan ole Hassan Al Banna dahulu. Ini kan lebih menunjukkan semangat ingat mengingati yang seharusnya adal dalam organisasi yang berpaksi kepada Islam seperti PAS.

Ada banyak cara untuk PAS memperjuangkan Islam tetapi biasalah bagi gerakkan politik baik PAS atau UMNO. Kuasa adalah matlamat utama dan bagaimana ia dicapai adalah tidak penting, samaada secara jujur atau kotor-tiada bezanya.

Bagi DAP pula bukan mereka menentang kerana mereka suka maksiat. Dalam kamus mereka tiada dosa pahala, yang ada hanyalah duit. Jika periuk nasi mereka terancam mereka akan menentang habis habisan. Bila PAS mengarahkan penutupan perniagaan mereka, bayangkanlah berapa banyak kerugian yang bakal mereka hadapi dengan sewa dan gaji pekerja harus dibayar.

Mungkin itulah sebabnya mengapa kilang arak di Shah Alam masih tidak ditutup sekalipun PAS berjanji yang sebaik sahaja mereka berkuasa ESOKnya mereka akan menutup kilang itu. Hingga hari ini ia masih disitu. Malah Khalid Samad pun dah menjejakkan kaki ke situ....hehehehe

Salam untuk politikus TIDAK CERDIK.